Re: [PATCH 11/14] NFS/RPC: Add the auth_seclabel security flavorto allow the process label to be sent to the server.

[Andy Whitcroft]

On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 01:06:23PM -0400, David P. Quigley wrote:
[...]
>  
> +	if (dom->flavour != &svcauth_unix
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY
> +	    && dom->flavour != &svcauth_seclabel
> +#endif
> +	   )
>  	if (dom->flavour != &svcauth_unix)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	udom = container_of(dom, struct unix_domain, h);
> @@ -873,3 +889,80 @@ struct auth_ops svcauth_unix = {
>  	.set_client	= svcauth_unix_set_client,
>  };

checkpatch picked up on a suspect code indent for this hunk.  It is
unhappy about the second if expecting it to be indented.  By the looks
of this I am suspecting a miss-merge of the change in this function and
the second if should have been removed.  To my reading it actually still
does the right thing but ...

-apw
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/