Re: [patch 3/7] x86, cpa: make the kernel physical mapping initializationa two pass sequence

[Jeremy Fitzhardinge]

Suresh Siddha wrote:
> Jeremy, hi. This dependency is not documented or explicitly called anywhere
> in the mm/init_64.c code. I would have expected to see a big comment near this
> kind of code :(
>   

Indeed yes.  I've explained it in various places, including commit 
comments, but there should be a comment right there in the code.

> It is not just the NX bit that we change. For DEBUG_PAGEALLOC, we want
> use 4k pages instead of large page mappings during the identity mapping
> (as this will clean some of the cpa pool code avoiding the cpa and hence
>  the page allocations for splitting the big pages from interrupt context's).
> In this case will will split the static large page mappings.
>   

Well, that's OK.  We just need to preserve the original page permissions 
when fragmenting the large mappings.  (This isn't a case that affects 
Xen, because it will already be 4k mappings.)

> >    3. The actual implementation is pretty ugly; adding a global variable
> >       and hopping about with goto does not improve this code.
> >     
>
> This is very early init code and I can't be fancy like calling cpa()
> which need mm to be up and running.

Well, is there any urgency to set NX that early?  It might catch some 
early bugs, but there's no urgent need.

>  And also, cpa's on individual chunks
> for entire identity mapping will make the boot slow.
>   

Really?  Why?  How slow?


> > it cause real failures?  Could we revert this patch and address the
> > problem some other way?  Which app note is this, BTW?  The one I have on
> > hand, "TLBs, Paging-Structure Caches, and Their Invalidation", Apr 2007,
> > does not seem to mention this restriction.
> >     
>
> http://developer.intel.com/design/processor/applnots/317080.pdf
> Section 6 page 26
>   

Ah, OK.  I have the first version of this document which does not 
mention this.  It would be good to explicitly cite this document by name 
in the comments.

> > Xen with this code in place (touching this code is always non-trivial).
> > I haven't looked into it in depth yet, but there's a few stand out "bad
> > for Xen" pieces of code here.  (And I haven't tested 32-bit yet.)
> >
> > Quick rules for keeping Xen happy here:
> >
> >    1. Xen provides its own initial pagetable; the head_64.S one is
> >       unused when booting under Xen.
> >    2. Xen requires that any pagetable page must always be mapped RO, so
> >       we're careful to not replace an existing mapping with a new one,
> >       in case the existing mapping is a pagetable one.
> >    3. Xen never uses large pages, and the hypervisor will fail any
> >       attempt to do so.
> >     
>
> Thanks for this info. Will get back to you tomorrow.
>   

Great.  Also, do you think you'll have a chance to look at unifying the 
32 and 64 bit code (where 32 uses the 64-bit version)?


Thanks,
   J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/