Re: [patch][repost] ide-tape build fix

[Borislav Petkov]

Hi,

On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 08:26:15PM +0200, Mark de Wever wrote:
> I never got a reaction on this patch, but please apply it.
> 
> In order to compile the kernel with IDETAPE_DEBUG_LOG enabled I had to
> apply the following build fix.

Bugger, I should be getting at least warnings when compiling this but I don't.
This is because I don't have CONFIG_LBD enabled. However, the %ld and %d
format specifiers are also not entirely correct but gcc doesn't warn about them
- I guess it checks only size but not signedness...

> Signed-off-by: Mark de Wever <koraq@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/ide/ide-tape.c b/drivers/ide/ide-tape.c
> index 3833189..7258eca 100644
> --- a/drivers/ide/ide-tape.c
> +++ b/drivers/ide/ide-tape.c
> @@ -978,9 +978,10 @@ static ide_startstop_t idetape_do_request(ide_drive_t *drive,
>  	struct request *postponed_rq = tape->postponed_rq;
>  	u8 stat;
>  
> -	debug_log(DBG_SENSE, "sector: %ld, nr_sectors: %ld,"
> +	debug_log(DBG_SENSE, "sector: %llu, nr_sectors: %ld,"

the other format specifiers should be rq->nr_sectors: %lu, rq->current_nr_sectors: %u.

>  			" current_nr_sectors: %d\n",
> -			rq->sector, rq->nr_sectors, rq->current_nr_sectors);
> +			(unsigned long long)rq->sector, rq->nr_sectors, 
> +			rq->current_nr_sectors);
>  
>  	if (!blk_special_request(rq)) {
>  		/* We do not support buffer cache originated requests. */
> 

Would you like to redo your patch and add a proper comment ontop?

Thanks.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/