Re: [PATCH 1/4] h8300: Change unaligned access to use packedstruct implementation

[Alexey Dobriyan]

On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 11:38:22PM -0700, Harvey Harrison wrote:
> There are only 3 arches that use the memmove-based implementation, there
> doesn't seem to be any obvious reason not to use the struct implementation.

1. Extensive use of "--- " area means changelogs are written badly.
2. Changing one of arch core header we can deduce from patch and this
   exactly what subject line says.
3. As such there is absolutely no changelog.

[goes into digging how all this byteorder and endian activity was
started]

> --- a/arch/h8300/include/asm/unaligned.h
> +++ b/arch/h8300/include/asm/unaligned.h

> -#include <linux/unaligned/be_memmove.h>
> +#include <linux/unaligned/be_struct.h>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/