Jeff Hansen wrote:--This worked perfectly! I second adding a kernel option that forces
trusting the TSC. I can make a patch if you'd like. Should the option be
something like "trusttsc" or "tsc=noverify"?
How about a "highres=noverify" flag, to disable all CLOCK_SOURCE_MUST_VERIFY checking? People might want to use this with other timers too.
-- Chris
On Wed, 8 Oct 2008, Chris Snook wrote:
> Jeff Hansen wrote:
> > Linus, Ingo, All,
> > > > I've been struggling with hrtimer support in 2.6.26.5 on an older
> > x86_32/i386 system, and I'm wondering if there are any easy fixes > > that you
> > (or anyone else) would suggest.
> > > > Basically, this system does not print out the message:
> > > > "Switched to high resolution mode on CPU 0"
> > > > indicating that one-shot, hrtimers, etc. won't work, since high > > resolution
> > mode has not been enabled. I've verified that hrtimers started with
> > hrtimer_start do not have the expected resolution further than 1/HZ.
> > > > This system does not have LAPIC, ACPI, or HPET, so really the only
> > clocksources I can use are TSC and PIT. This should be fine (in > > theory,
> > unless it wasn't designed like that), but apparently the clocksource > > flags
> > are not initialized in such a way that one of them ever gets marked > > as
> > CLOCK_SOURCE_VALID_FOR_HRES.
> > > > The flow of the flags on each of these clocksources is as follows:
> > > > 1) The flags on the TSC clocksource are CLOCK_SOURCE_IS_CONTINUOUS |
> > CLOCK_SOURCE_MUST_VERIFY, which causes PIT to be used as the > > watchdog
> > clocksource. (see kernel/time/clocksource.c:~171)
> > 2) Around line 122 in kernel/time/clocksource.c, where most > > clocksources'
> > flags usually get ORed with CLOCK_SOURCE_VALID_FOR_HRES, the > > PIT's do
> > not because it is not CLOCK_SOURCE_IS_CONTINUOUS, and the TSC's > > do not
> > also because the PIT (as the watchdog) is not
> > CLOCK_SOURCE_IS_CONTINUOUS.
> > > > I get the same results on a new laptop booting into 32-bit Linux with > > hpet
> > and acpi disabled.
> > > > Can you please tell me if this is supposed to work, and I just have a
> > poorly configured kernel; or if TSC/PIT drivers were not designed to > > work
> > this way in the first place. If it wasn't designed to do this, do > > you
> > have any tips on implementing this, since I'll be needing to do that?
> > > > -Jeff Hansen
> > This is not supposed to work, but it might be worthwhile to add a boot > option to force the kernel to trust the TSC, as hardware that lacks any > high-res timers also tends to be primitive enough that the TSC can be > trusted, if it exists. If you patch out the CLOCK_SOURCE_MUST_VERIFY > flag on the TSC, do you get correctly-functioning high-res timers on > this system?
> > -- Chris
> > >