Re: [PATCH 6/6] memcg: lazy lru addition

[Daisuke Nishimura]

On Wed, 1 Oct 2008 17:01:19 +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Delaying add_to_lru() and do it in batched manner like page_vec.
> For doing that 2 flags PCG_USED and PCG_LRU.
> 
> Because __set_page_cgroup_lru() itself doesn't take lock_page_cgroup(),
> we need a sanity check inside lru_lock().
> 
> And this delaying make css_put()/get() complicated. 
> To make it clear,
>  * css_get() is called from mem_cgroup_add_list().
>  * css_put() is called from mem_cgroup_remove_list().
>  * css_get()->css_put() is called while try_charge()->commit/cancel sequence.
> is newly added.
> 

I like this new policy, but

> @@ -710,17 +774,18 @@ static void __mem_cgroup_commit_charge(s

===
                if (PageCgroupLRU(pc)) {
                        ClearPageCgroupLRU(pc);
                        __mem_cgroup_remove_list(mz, pc);
                        css_put(&pc->mem_cgroup->css);
                }
                spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mz->lru_lock, flags);
        }
===

Is this css_put needed yet?

>  	/* Here, PCG_LRU bit is cleared */
>  	pc->mem_cgroup = mem;
>  	/*
> +	 * We have to set pc->mem_cgroup before set USED bit for avoiding
> +	 * race with (delayed) __set_page_cgroup_lru() in other cpu.
> +	 */
> +	smp_wmb();
> +	/*
>  	 * below pcg_default_flags includes PCG_LOCK bit.
>  	 */
>  	pc->flags = pcg_default_flags[ctype];
>  	unlock_page_cgroup(pc);
>  
> -	mz = page_cgroup_zoneinfo(pc);
> -
> -	spin_lock_irqsave(&mz->lru_lock, flags);
> -	__mem_cgroup_add_list(mz, pc, true);
> -	SetPageCgroupLRU(pc);
> -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mz->lru_lock, flags);
> +	set_page_cgroup_lru(pc);
> +	css_put(&mem->css);
>  }
>  
>  /**


Thanks,
Daisuke Nishimura.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/