Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/5] sched: modular find_busiest_group()

[Vaidyanathan Srinivasan]

* Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx> [2008-10-09 16:19:28]:

> 
> Hi,
> 
> I've looked over the last posting, but so far failed to respond :/
> 
> While I like the clean-up, I'm atm a bit reluctant to apply, as I'm
> trying to rework the sched_domain stuff and the HT balancing and I'm not
> quite sure how this will interact with your patches.

Hi Peter,

Thanks for reviewing the changes.  I just wanted an initial feedback
before I spend too much time on this approach.  I am interested in HT
balancing stuff and I wanted to study the behaviour and improve the
power saving heuristics there as well.

> I hope to share my proposal (in talk - no patches yet) soonish (this
> weekend, early next week) so that we can discuss it.

I am looking forward to it.  We can definitely rework the
implementation to seamlessly take on power saving heuristics.

Thanks,
Vaidy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/