Re: [PATCH 4/7] ide: ide_hwgroup_t.rq doesn't need an ide_lock held

[Elias Oltmanns]

Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [PATCH] ide: ide_hwgroup_t.rq doesn't need an ide_lock held
>
> While at it:
> - no need to check for hwgroup presence in ide_dump_opcode()
>
> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
[...]
> Index: b/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
> ===================================================================
> --- a/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
> +++ b/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
[...]
> @@ -274,7 +269,11 @@ static void ide_complete_pm_request (ide
>  		drive->dev_flags &= ~IDE_DFLAG_BLOCKED;
>  		blk_start_queue(drive->queue);
>  	}
> -	HWGROUP(drive)->rq = NULL;
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ide_lock, flags);
> +
> +	drive->hwif->hwgroup->rq = NULL;
> +
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&ide_lock, flags);
>  	if (__blk_end_request(rq, 0, 0))
>  		BUG();
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ide_lock, flags);

Is it really an improvement to release the lock here?

Regards,

Elias
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/