Re: acpi-test tree on eeepc: EC error message on second resume

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Saturday, 11 of October 2008, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> No, we discussed this before -- we are outside of the transaction, thus 
> >> no GPE
> >> activity could interfere with ec_check_ibf0.
> > 
> > Ok, this is in the process context and we don't really expect to get an
> > interrupt at this point, but what happens if the EC generates an event that's
> > not related to any transiaction.  Is that guaranteed to never happen?
> Interrupt handler in this case can't cause a change to status register, thus our 
> read of it will not be affected by interrupt.

Ok, thanks.

Alan, does the patch work for you?

Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/