Re: [PATCH 0/2] SIGWINCH problem with terminal apps still alive

[Bodo Eggert]

On Mon, 13 Oct 2008, Alan Cox wrote:
> Bodo Eggert <7eggert@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Sun, 12 Oct 2008, Alan Cox wrote:

> > > > That is why I propose usage of real_tty in ioctl() handling:
> > > > 
> > > > case TIOCGWINSZ:
> > > >                 return tiocgwinsz(real_tty, p);
> > > 
> > > Congratulations we've finally got there - and that is exactly the code in
> > > the current tty tree.
> > 
> > These patches are missing from 2.6.27. There you have:
> > 
> >     case TIOCGWINSZ:
> >         return tiocgwinsz(tty, p);
> 
> Yes I know. The rules for the stable tree are that it has to go upstream
> first. It has not gone upstream so it cannot go into the stable tree yet.
> As and when Linus takes the relevant changes I will send a set to the
> stable tree.

Nice to hear. I misunderstood the waiting for 2.6.27 part as in "Will be 
fixed there" ... until I saw your patchset.
-- 
You must be the arithmetic man -- you add trouble, subtract pleasure, divide
attention, and multiply ignorance. You have an inferiority complex -- and
it's fully justified. You used to be arrogant and obnoxious. Now you are
just the opposite. You are obnoxious and arrogant. -- Harry Murphy in a.2.hz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/