Re: [PATCH] fastboot: Introduce an asynchronous function callmechanism

[Alexey Dobriyan]

On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 10:55:15AM -0700, Roland Dreier wrote:
>  > > I was actually "?"ing at the "= 0".  I thought that would be obvious
>  > > but it's whizzed past two people so far :(
>  > 
>  > Is there evidence that some gccs will not add such variable to .bss?
>  > 
>  > Because "= 0;" is more readable.
> 
> From: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.3/changes.html
> 
>   GCC 3.3.1 automatically places zero-initialized variables in the .bss
>   section on some operating systems. Versions of GNU Emacs up to (and
>   including) 21.3 will not work correctly when using this optimization;
>   you can use -fno-zero-initialized-in-bss to disable it.
> 
> so presumably gcc 3.2 (which we still support, right?) does not do this
> (and puts such variables in .data).

So we're doing this for one low-end gcc version, nobody except Andi uses
(it must be patched surely).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/