Re: [PATCH 2/6] vfs: add d_ancestor()
From: OGAWA Hirofumi
Date: Wed Oct 15 2008 - 17:42:20 EST
Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> This change looks good, but a slightly more detailed changelog would be
> good.
tweaked...
>> /*
>> - * Helper that returns 1 if p1 is a parent of p2, else 0
>> + * Helper that returns the ancestor dentry of p2 which is a child of
>> + * p1, if p1 is an ancestor of p2, else NULL.
>> */
>> -static int d_isparent(struct dentry *p1, struct dentry *p2)
>> +struct dentry *d_ancestor(struct dentry *p1, struct dentry *p2)
>
> Given that d_ancestor is non-static a kerneldoc comment describing it
> instead of a plain one would be good.
Yes.
>> int is_subdir(struct dentry * new_dentry, struct dentry * old_dentry)
>> {
>> int result;
>> - struct dentry * saved = new_dentry;
>> unsigned long seq;
>>
>> + if (new_dentry == old_dentry)
>> + return 1;
>
> Maybe a comment like in your commit description here would be good?
Sure, thanks.
> /*
> * Need rcu_readlock to protect against the d_parent trashing due to
> * d_move.
> */
> rcu_read_lock();
> do {
> /* for restarting inner loop in case of seq retry */
> seq = read_seqbegin(&rename_lock);
> if (d_ancestor(old_dentry, new_dentry))
> result = 1;
> else
> result = 0;
> } while (read_seqretry(&rename_lock, seq));
> rcu_read_unlock();
I'll borrow your version. Thanks.
--
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/