Re: [PATCH -mm -v5] Separate atomic_t declaration from asm/atomic.h into asm/atomic_def.h

[Matthew Wilcox]

On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 03:11:19PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 12:47:19 -0600
> Matthew Wilcox <matthew@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > Roman Zippel did me one better and suggested just putting it in types.h,
> > which works for me.
> 
> OK.  Or we could do the usual include/asm-generic/atomic_types.h and
> then architectures can choose to include that if it is appropriate.
> 
> Anyway the good news is that this concept is an addition to rather than
> a replacement of this current patch.

Um, no.  Roman and I are against the creation of a new file.  Just put
the atomic_t definition in <linux/types.h>.

-- 
Matthew Wilcox				Intel Open Source Technology Centre
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours.  We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/