Re: [tbench regression fixes]: digging out smelly deadmen.

From: David Miller
Date: Fri Oct 31 2008 - 05:52:38 EST


From: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 11:40:16 +0200 (EET)

> Let me remind that it is just a single process, so no ping-pong & other
> lock related cache effects should play any significant role here, no? (I'm
> no expert though :-)).

Not locks or ping-pongs perhaps, I guess. So it just sends and
receives over a socket, implementing both ends of the communication
in the same process?

If hash chain conflicts do happen for those 2 sockets, just traversing
the chain 2 entries deep could show up.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/