Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.27 - SMP enabled, but only 1 CPU

[Jeremy Fitzhardinge]

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> a "cleanup" impact line is only added if the change is not intended to 
> have any side-effects whatsoever.
>
> We can drop it but it would be really nice to figure out what's going 
> on. In a very quick late-night look i cannot see anything particularly 
> weird about it, but based on the type of changes it does there are 
> three leading candidates: lost high 32 bits, zero extend problem, or 
> incorrect types.

Yeah, I couldn't see anything either.  It's a reasonable cleanup (I 
never did understand that struct page * cast), but its always nicer when 
cleanups don't break working code ;).

   J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/