Re: [PATCH] cpumask: introduce new API, without changing anything
From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Fri Nov 07 2008 - 04:12:14 EST
Hi Ingo,
On Fri, 7 Nov 2008 09:40:16 +0100 Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> if this is equal to the patch that you sent me (see the git
> coordinates below), it was also stess-tested and build-coverage tested
> by me on a healthy range of x86 systems, in a range of build
> environments.
It isn't identical. See my message about a small merge conflict between
the cpus4096 tree and the rr tree in linux-next today.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Attachment:
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature