Re: [PATCH] x86: x86_32 has its own irq_regs definition

[Ingo Molnar]

* Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Impact: prevent second percpu define of unused irq_regs
> 
> Arches that have their own irq_regs definition are expected to
> define ARCH_HAS_OWN_IRQ_REGS or else a generic (unused) set
> will also be defined in lib/irq_regs.c
> 
> Sparse noticed the unused generic one had no prototype:
> lib/irq_regs.c:15:1: warning: symbol 'per_cpu____irq_regs' was not declared. Should it be static?
> 
> Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/irq_regs_32.h |    2 ++
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

applied to tip/x86/cleanups, thanks Harvey!

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/