Re: [RFC][mm] [PATCH 3/4] Memory cgroup hierarchical reclaim (v3)

[Balbir Singh]

KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Nov 2008 11:40:13 +0530
> Balbir Singh <balbir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I think of it as easy to update - as in the modularity, you can plug out
>> hierarchical reclaim easily and implement your own hierarchical reclaim.
>>
> When I do so, I'll rewrite all, again.
> 

I don't intend to ask you to rewrite it, rewrite all, I meant you as in a
generic person. With hierarchy we will need weighted reclaim, which I'll add in
later.

>>> Can you make this code iterative rather than recursive ?
>>>
>>> I don't like this kind of recursive call with complexed lock/unlock.
>> I tried an iterative version, which ended up looking very ugly. I think the
>> recursive version is easier to understand. What we do is a DFS walk - pretty
>> standard algorithm.
>>
> But recursive one is not good for search-and-try algorithm.

OK, I'll post the iterative algorithm, but it is going to be dirty :)

-- 
	Balbir
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/