Re: [PATCH 1/1] ftrace: do not update max buffer with no users

From: Steven Rostedt
Date: Wed Nov 12 2008 - 21:47:36 EST




On Wed, 12 Nov 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
>
> This sort of thing:
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_TRACER_MAX_TRACE
> if (current_trace && current_trace->print_max)
> iter->tr = &max_tr;
> else
> +#endif
> iter->tr = inode->i_private;
>
> is particularly regrettable.

Another answer is to not allocate it and check for NULL before using it.
But this would mean that I would have to find all the places that touch it
(the same as the ifdefs) and make sure they are safe.

The reason I picked the ifdefs was to guarantee that there were no users
if it was not being used.

-- Steve

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/