Re: [PATCH 2/7] kprobes: Add kprobe_insn_mutex and cleanup arch_remove_kprobe()

[Masami Hiramatsu]

Hi Andrew,

Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 15:56:21 -0500
> Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Add kprobe_insn_mutex for protecting kprobe_insn_pages hlist, and remove
> > kprobe_mutex from architecture dependent code.
> >
> > This allows us to call arch_remove_kprobe() (and free_insn_slot) while holding
> > kprobe_mutex.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/kernel/kprobes.c     |    2 --
> >  arch/ia64/kernel/kprobes.c    |    8 +++++---
> >  arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c |    7 ++++---
> >  arch/s390/kernel/kprobes.c    |    7 ++++---
> >  arch/x86/kernel/kprobes.c     |    7 ++++---
> >  include/linux/kprobes.h       |    1 -
> >  kernel/kprobes.c              |   25 +++++++++++++++++++++----
>
> For some reasons sparc64 never had this mutex.  You've checked that
> sparc64 will be OK after this change?

I think it's OK for those archs.

Actually, this mutex is protecting insn_slot which stores copied
instructions into executable memory. Some architectures which
doesn't need that special memory have its own buffer in the
arch_specific_insn and they don't use insn_slot. On those arch,
kprobe_insn_mutex is not used (not defined).

Thank you,

--
Masami Hiramatsu

Software Engineer
Hitachi Computer Products (America) Inc.
Software Solutions Division

e-mail: mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/