Re: [PATCH 1/2] tracing/function-graph-tracer: signal interruptsentry/exit points on outpout
From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Mon Dec 08 2008 - 08:48:01 EST
* Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 2008/12/8 Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>:
> > On Mon, 2008-12-08 at 01:54 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> >> Impact: provide interrupt detection on output
> >>
> >> Suggested by Ingo.
> >> If a hardirq is raised, we want it to be signaled on output, so this patch
> >> adds two arrows on the output to find entry and exit points of a hardirq.
> >>
> >> Unfortunately, there are many interrupt entrypoints and these can be differents
> >> from one arch to another.
> >>
> >> The approach here is one of the easiest, but doesn't shine by its scalability:
> >> we have an array of the interrupt entrypoints names that we compare with the
> >> symbol of the current traced function, if it matches, we draw the arrow.
> >>
> >> Ie:
> >>
> >> 1) | unlock_buffer() {
> >> 1) | wake_up_bit() {
> >> 1) | bit_waitqueue() {
> >> 1) 0.872 us | __phys_addr();
> >> 1) 2.722 us | }
> >> 1) | __wake_up_bit() {
> >> 1) ==> __wake_up_bit() {
> >> 1) | do_IRQ() {
> >
> > Would be much nicer, the current proposal is lost when grepping and adds
> > a weird visual break in the output.
>
>
> Ok, I will apply it like this in the V2.
> Thanks!
note that since the IRQ marker always comes on an entry record, there's
space in the usecs field for something like:
1) 2.722 us | }
1) | __wake_up_bit() {
1) [IRQ#123] ==> __wake_up_bit() {
right?
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/