[PATCH] x86: fix default_spin_lock_flags() prototype

[Ingo Molnar]

these warnings:

  arch/x86/kernel/paravirt-spinlocks.c: In function âdefault_spin_lock_flagsâ:
  arch/x86/kernel/paravirt-spinlocks.c:12: warning: passing argument 1 of â__raw_spin_lockâ from incompatible pointer type
  arch/x86/kernel/paravirt-spinlocks.c: At top level:
  arch/x86/kernel/paravirt-spinlocks.c:11: warning: âdefault_spin_lock_flagsâ defined but not used

showed that the prototype of default_spin_lock_flags() was confused about
what type spinlocks have.

the proper type on UP is raw_spinlock_t.

Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/paravirt-spinlocks.c |    3 ++-
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt-spinlocks.c b/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt-spinlocks.c
index 0e9f198..95777b0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt-spinlocks.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt-spinlocks.c
@@ -7,7 +7,8 @@
 
 #include <asm/paravirt.h>
 
-static void default_spin_lock_flags(struct raw_spinlock *lock, unsigned long flags)
+static inline void
+default_spin_lock_flags(raw_spinlock_t *lock, unsigned long flags)
 {
 	__raw_spin_lock(lock);
 }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/