Re: [PATCH 0/2] module_refcounting and anonymous inodes

[Avi Kivity]

Sheng Yang wrote:
> Should we push the first patch to 2.6.28? 

It's not a recent regression, so no.

> I got some trouble with the separate 
> 2nd patch, for I am using Linus' tree and make KVM as modules, so the 
> reference count reduced to negative now... (Oh Avi, I know you suggest to use 
> in kernel rather than modules, but module is indeed convenient. :) )
>   

Right, that would affect everyone.  What we need is to hack the second 
patch for external modules on <2.6.29.

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/