[PATCH 44/44] KVM: MMU: optimize set_spte for page sync

[Avi Kivity]

From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@xxxxxxxxxx>

The write protect verification in set_spte is unnecessary for page sync.

Its guaranteed that, if the unsync spte was writable, the target page
does not have a write protected shadow (if it had, the spte would have
been write protected under mmu_lock by rmap_write_protect before).

Same reasoning applies to mark_page_dirty: the gfn has been marked as
dirty via the pagefault path.

The cost of hash table and memslot lookups are quite significant if the
workload is pagetable write intensive resulting in increased mmu_lock
contention.

Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c |    9 +++++++++
 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
index fa3486d..dd20b19 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -1593,6 +1593,15 @@ static int set_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *shadow_pte,
 
 		spte |= PT_WRITABLE_MASK;
 
+		/*
+		 * Optimization: for pte sync, if spte was writable the hash
+		 * lookup is unnecessary (and expensive). Write protection
+		 * is responsibility of mmu_get_page / kvm_sync_page.
+		 * Same reasoning can be applied to dirty page accounting.
+		 */
+		if (!can_unsync && is_writeble_pte(*shadow_pte))
+			goto set_pte;
+
 		if (mmu_need_write_protect(vcpu, gfn, can_unsync)) {
 			pgprintk("%s: found shadow page for %lx, marking ro\n",
 				 __func__, gfn);
-- 
1.6.0.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/