Re: [PATCH] block: Fix LSF default inconsistency

[Jens Axboe]

On Thu, Dec 11 2008, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > > No objection from me, getting rid of configuration options almost
> > > always gets my vote :)
> > 
> > Yeah, mine too. One recent addition was CONFIG_UNEVICTABLE_LRU - why on
> > earth is that an option?!
> 
> As far as I know, CONFIG_UNEVICTABLE_LRU depend on CONFIG_MMU
> because any unevictable lru developer don't have nommu machine ;)
> 
> I expect that nobody of mmu user don't turn off unevictable lru feature.

Perhaps I didn't frase the question correctly. My question is, why is it
a visible option? Does it make ANY sense to turn off
CONFIG_UNEVICTABLE_LRU?

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/