Re: [PATCH] e1000e: fix double release of mutex
From: Jeff Kirsher
Date: Fri Dec 12 2008 - 00:24:58 EST
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 9:20 PM, Jeff Kirsher
<jeffrey.t.kirsher@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> During a reset, releasing the swflag after it failed to be acquired would
> cause a double unlock of the mutex. Instead, test whether acquisition of
> the swflag was successful and if not, do not release the swflag. The reset
> must still be done to bring the device to a quiescent state.
>
> This resolves [BUG 12200] BUG: bad unlock balance detected! e1000e
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12200
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> drivers/net/e1000e/ich8lan.c | 9 +++++++--
> 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000e/ich8lan.c b/drivers/net/e1000e/ich8lan.c
> index 523b971..d115a6d 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/e1000e/ich8lan.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/e1000e/ich8lan.c
> @@ -1893,12 +1893,17 @@ static s32 e1000_reset_hw_ich8lan(struct e1000_hw *hw)
> ctrl |= E1000_CTRL_PHY_RST;
> }
> ret_val = e1000_acquire_swflag_ich8lan(hw);
> + /* Whether or not the swflag was acquired, we need to reset the part */
> hw_dbg(hw, "Issuing a global reset to ich8lan");
> ew32(CTRL, (ctrl | E1000_CTRL_RST));
> msleep(20);
>
> - /* release the swflag because it is not reset by hardware reset */
> - e1000_release_swflag_ich8lan(hw);
> + if (!ret_val) {
> + /* release the swflag because it is not reset by
> + * hardware reset
> + */
> + e1000_release_swflag_ich8lan(hw);
> + }
>
> ret_val = e1000e_get_auto_rd_done(hw);
> if (ret_val) {
>
> --
>
I meant to put [RESPIN] in the title, but I did not. So here is the respin.
--
Cheers,
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/