Re: [rfc][patch] SLQB slab allocator

[Nick Piggin]

On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 08:23:55AM +0100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Anyway, I'll see if I can work out why SLQB is slower. Do you have
> socketallocbench online?

Hmph, it seems to be in the noise (I'm testing with an AMD system
though). Some boots SLAB is faster, other boots, SLQB is. Could be
a matter of luck in cacheline placement maybe?

I think this benchmark (after the slab rcu patch) will be pretty
trivial for any slab allocator because it will basically be each
CPU allocating then freeing an object.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/