Re: CFS scheduler OLTP perforamnce

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 15:15 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> >> 
> >> It seems that in this case renice to higher priority with CFS did not
> >> reduce scheduling latency as well as SCHED_RR.
> >
> > Is there a question in this email?
> 
> The question is how to make nice perform as well as SCHED_RR.

Depending on the circumstances, you can't - SCHED_RR doesn't bother with
fairness.

That is not to say there is no room for improvement, but that really
needs more information.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/