Re: [PATCH v3 6/7] fs: struct file move from call_rcu() toSLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU

[Christoph Lameter]

On Fri, 12 Dec 2008, Eric Dumazet wrote:

> > a truly allocated file. At this point the file is
> > a truly allocated file but not anymore ours.

Its a valid file. Does ownership matter here?

> Reading again this mail I realise we call put_filp(file), while this should
> be fput(file) or put_filp(file), we dont know.
>
> Damned, this patch is wrong as is.
>
> Christoph, Paul, do you see the problem ?

Yes.

> In fget()/fget_light() we dont know if the other thread (the one who re-allocated the file,
> and tried to close it while we got a reference on file) had to call put_filp() or fput()
> to release its own reference. So we call atomic_long_dec_and_test() and cannot
> take the appropriate action (calling the full __fput() version or the small one,
> that some systems use to 'close' an not really opened file.

The difference is mainly that fput() does full processing whereas
put_filp() is used when we know that the file was not fully operational.
If the checks in __fput are able to handle the put_filp() situation by not
releasing resources that were not allocated then we should be fine.

> I believe put_filp() is only called on slowpath (error cases).

Looks like it. It seems to assume that no dentry is associated.

> Should we just zap it and always call fput() ?

Only if fput() can handle partially setup files.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/