Re: [RFC] x86: entry_64 - introduce FTRACE_ frame macro

[Steven Rostedt]

On Sat, 13 Dec 2008, Fr?d?ric Weisbecker wrote:
> 2008/12/13 Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Hi,
> 
> Looks good and clarify the asm bits.
> 
> I wonder if the function_graph_tracer should continue to necessarily
> depend on the function tracer.
> It was more simplier to do so but perhaps that could be avoided with
> small modifications.

It could be, but remember, the dynamic ftrace gives the ability to specify 
which function can be chosen.

But on the other hand, I guess it would be fine to have it separate. There 
is no reason that it can not be. I would still keep the dynamic part 
dependent on function tracer. At least for now.

-- Steve

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/