Re: GPIO: Fix probe() error return in gpio driver probes

[Jean Delvare]

On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 10:16:16 +0000, Ben Dooks wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 08:46:00AM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 16:11:17 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> > > On Sunday 14 December 2008, Ben Dooks wrote:
> > > > Has anyone reveiwed this patch? Are there any comments, or can this
> > > > be commited at somepoint (even if it is during the next merge window)?
> > > 
> > > I was thinking that -EINVAL is almost the least informative
> > > diagnostic code possible, since so many places return it
> > > that it's usually hard to find out *which* invalid parameter
> > > triggered ...
> > > 
> > > Is there a less-overloaded code you could return?
> > 
> > -EINVAL sounds right to me, all that's really missing is dev_dbg()
> > messages in the drivers to log what the exact problem was. 
> 
> It might be more acceptable to be dev_err(), that way it will get
> printed no matter what debug options have been selected. If so, a
> seperate patch is probably in order to make the change.

As far as I can see, such errors would be caused by development-time
mistakes, so dev_dbg() seems appropriate. dev_err() would make the
binaries larger for all end-users.

-- 
Jean Delvare
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/