Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/7][v4] Define siginfo_from_ancestor_ns()

[Oleg Nesterov]

On 12/24, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
>
> Oleg Nesterov [oleg@xxxxxxxxxx] wrote:
> | And, SI_ASYNCIO only matters when we send the signal to the subnamespace,
> | and in that case we will probably mangle .si_pid. So why don't we warn
> | when .si_code == SI_USER?
>
> I was wondering if I should there too :-) But what do you think ?

Well, if you ask me, I'd suggest to document the problems with
sigqueueinfo() and forget. Whatever we do, we can't be always
right.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/