Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333smp_call_function_mask

From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Sat Dec 27 2008 - 06:25:32 EST



* Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> * Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> [2008-12-27 09:39:36]:
>
> >
> > * Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > * Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +extern int arch_init_chip_data(struct irq_desc *desc, int cpu);
> > >
> > > when you change a function declaration's return type, you _must_ double
> > > check whether you properly updated all instances of that function. In
> > > this case you forgot about the io_apic.c instance.
> >
> > the corrected patch is below.
> >
> > Ingo
> >
>
> > --------------->
> > From d353c528bbb29be434f7688cba9b59781e9151e3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 02:05:47 -0800
> > Subject: [PATCH] sparseirq: work around compiler optimizing away __weak functions
> >
> > Impact: fix panic on null pointer with sparseirq
> >
> > Some GCC versions seem to inline the weak global function,
> > when that function is empty.
> >
> > Work it around, by making the functions return a (dummy) integer.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yinghai <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/kernel/io_apic.c | 6 ++++--
> > include/linux/irq.h | 6 +++---
> > init/main.c | 7 ++++---
> > kernel/irq/handle.c | 7 ++++---
> > 4 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/io_apic.c b/arch/x86/kernel/io_apic.c
> > index 2fe543f..e4d4d19 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/io_apic.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/io_apic.c
> > @@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ static struct irq_cfg irq_cfgx[NR_IRQS] = {
> > [15] = { .domain = CPU_MASK_ALL, .vector = IRQ15_VECTOR, },
> > };
> >
> > -void __init arch_early_irq_init(void)
> > +int __init arch_early_irq_init(void)
> > {
> > struct irq_cfg *cfg;
> > struct irq_desc *desc;
> > @@ -184,6 +184,8 @@ void __init arch_early_irq_init(void)
> > desc = irq_to_desc(i);
> > desc->chip_data = &cfg[i];
> > }
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > }
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_SPARSE_IRQ
> > @@ -212,7 +214,7 @@ static struct irq_cfg *get_one_free_irq_cfg(int cpu)
> > return cfg;
> > }
> >
> > -void arch_init_chip_data(struct irq_desc *desc, int cpu)
> > +int arch_init_chip_data(struct irq_desc *desc, int cpu)
> > {
> > struct irq_cfg *cfg;
>
> the return statement is missing in the patch.

yes, indeed - updated patch below.

Ingo

--------------->