Re: [PATCH 0 of 9] swiotlb: use phys_addr_t for pages
From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Sun Dec 28 2008 - 06:57:01 EST
* FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> You brought up a different topic, DMA bouncing implementations
> unification. DMA bouncing implementations unification is a very nice
> cleanup. But it's not related with Becky's patch to break IA64 build at
> all.
All i'm saying is that obviously neither Jeremy's nor Becky's patches were
created in a vacuum, and had it not been for the need and desire to extend
swiotlb we'd not have seen Becky's 9/9 cleanup patch either.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/