Re: [PATCH 0/3] Remove interrupt stack table usage from x86_64 kernel

[Avi Kivity]

Andi Kleen wrote:
> > This makes the whole thing unworthwhile.  The vmload/vmsave pair costs 
> > only 200 cycles (I should have started with this), and 120 cycles on the 
> > heavyweight path plus complexity are not worth 200 cycles on the 
> > lightweight path.
> >     
>
> Actually to switch ISTs you need to change the TSS, not the IDT.
> But I suppose that won't be any faster.
>   

I can't touch the TSS (that's the starting point of the exercise).  The 
plan was to have a copy of the IDT with all IST pointers zeroed out (or 
to have per-cpu IDT and zero out the IST pointers when entering guest 
mode, restoring them on context switch).

It's not worth it though.

--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/