Re: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches

[David Howells]

Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> And that of course means that many many 2.6.28 patches which I am
> maintaining will need significant rework to apply on top of linux-next,
> and then they won't apply to mainline.  Or that linux-next will not apply
> on top of those patches.  Mainly memory management.

Significant rework to many many patches?  The FS-Cache patches don't have all
that much impact outside of their own directories, AFS and NFS.

> Please drop the NFS tree until after -rc1.
> 
> Guys, this: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/12/27/173

Okay, that's a reasonable request.

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/