Re: [patch] locking, percpu counters: introduce separate lockclasses
From: David Miller
Date: Tue Dec 30 2008 - 02:04:48 EST
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 07:56:50 +0100
>
> * David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
> > Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 07:05:36 +0100
> >
> > > One small nit: could you please add the Reported-by line for Jeff Kirscher
> > > who reported the problem originally:
> > >
> > > Reported-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > I'll make sure to add that to the commit message after
> > you successfully test Herbert's patch.
> >
> > Thanks.
>
> early indications are good: after about 15 random bootup tests the lockdep
> warning has not triggered. (it would trigger on every 2nd kernel before
> that - there's a 66% chance for lockdep to be enabled in my randconfig
> tests)
Sounds good. I'll toss this into my net-2.6 tree, with Jeff's
reported-by and your Tested-by, and send this off to Linus
tonight.
Thanks everyone.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/