Re: [PATCH] minix: fix add link - wrong position calculation
From: Al Viro
Date: Tue Dec 30 2008 - 20:49:36 EST
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 02:26:41AM +0100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > commit 4a66af9eaa9531372cfcb9e20103ed147c729ff9
> > Author: Nick Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxx>
> > AuthorDate: Tue Oct 16 01:25:21 2007 -0700
> > Commit: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > CommitDate: Tue Oct 16 09:42:57 2007 -0700
> >
> > minixfs: convert to new aops
> >
> > Is minixfs getting THAT little use, or is this bustage more subtle
> > than it appears?
>
> Not getting used, I'd suspect (although I definitely have used it -- I
> converted it to large block size for testing fsblock, probably I didn't
> test softlinks).
Much simpler: there's one index for which the expressions are equivalent ;-)
Count how many entries does it take on minixfs to get to 4Kb. Now think
how many had used that sucker on directories with >= 128 entries...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/