Re: [PATCH 1/9] exofs: osd Swiss army knife

[Andrew Morton]

On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 17:33:41 +0200 Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Andrew Morton wrote:
> >> +int prepare_get_attr_list_add_entry(struct osd_request *req,
> >> +				    uint32_t page_num,
> >> +				    uint32_t attr_num,
> >> +				    uint32_t attr_len)
> >> +{
> >> +	struct osd_attr attr = {
> >> +		.page = page_num,
> > 
> > Kernel developers expect a field called "page" to have type `struct
> > page *'.  osd_attr.page is thus designed to confuse.
> > 
> >> ...
> >>
> > 
> 
> Rant below (can be ignored):
>   This single fix will cause a massive change to the open-osd
>   initiator patchset, (18 patches), and resubmission .I made the mistake
>   because this name originates from a file that all naming conventions
>   are taken from the OSD standard text. However this is no excuse
>   for using a well known Kernel construct name. I will fix it. And
>   will be more careful in the future.

The world wouldn't end if you left the code as-is.  We've done worse things :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/