Re: [PATCH 0/13] IA64: unifying ways to handle multiple sets of dma mapping ops

From: Sam Ravnborg
Date: Wed Jan 07 2009 - 14:55:26 EST


On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 11:36:05PM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> This patchset is the first part of the unification of ways to handle
> multiple sets of dma mapping API. The whole work consists of three
> patchset. This is for IA64 and can be applied independently.
>
> dma_mapping_ops (or dma_ops) struct is used to handle multiple sets of
> dma mapping API by X86, SPARC, and POWER. IA64 also handle multiple
> sets of dma mapping API but in a very different way (some define
> magic).
>
> X86 and IA64 share VT-d and SWIOTLB code. We need several workarounds
> for it because of the deference of ways to handle multiple sets of dma
> mapping API (e.g., X86 people can't freely change struct
> dma_mapping_ops in x86's dma-mapping.h now because it could break
> IA64). Seems POWER will use SWIOTLB code soon. I think that it's time
> to unify ways to handle multiple sets of dma mapping API. After
> applying the whole work, we have struct dma_map_ops
> include/linux/dma-mapping.h (I also dream of changing all the archs to
> use SWIOTLB in order to remove the bounce code in the block and
> network stacks...).
>
> This patchset changes IA64 to handle multiple sets of dma mapping API
> in the common way (as X86, SPARC, and POWER do):

Do you have any plans to update sparc too?
Maybe it is not relevant.

Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/