Re: [PATCH 03/15] ACPICA: move common private headers underkernel/acpi/acpica/

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 11:10:17PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> i still tend to regard kernel/* as the core Linux kernel, as code that can 
> be improved infinitely (only subject to the laws of physics), without 
> having to worry about how the ACPI spec wants certain things done.
> 
> The moment you bring in "this has to work on BSD, etc." arguments it will 
> be a never ending excuse for crap. Standards tend to create the _worst_ 
> possible code, because every vendor compromizes a bit on another vendor's 
> crap, just to be able to get in their own important crap. So the more 
> vendors there are in a standards group, the crappier the end result is 
> technically.
> 
> Also, ACPI is an environment/bootstrap detail well placed under 
> drivers/acpi/ - why should it move to kernel/acpi/ ? The fact that it's 
> used widely is immaterial - by that argument we could move arch/x86/ to 
> kernel/x86/, and we could move drivers/ata/ to kernel/ata/ as well. (they 
> are probably even more widely deployed than ACPI)

I agree.  acpi has no business under kernel/.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/