Re: [git pull -tip] headers_check fixes for other architectures
From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Mon Feb 02 2009 - 13:08:58 EST
* Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 11:49, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > These are the remaining ones on x86:
> >
> > 17 /dev/shm/tip/usr/include/linux/reiserfs_fs.h
> > 12 /dev/shm/tip/usr/include/linux/soundcard.h
> > 6 /dev/shm/tip/usr/include/asm/setup.h
> > 3 /dev/shm/tip/usr/include/linux/nubus.h
> > 2 /dev/shm/tip/usr/include/linux/in6.h
> > 1 /dev/shm/tip/usr/include/mtd/jffs2-user.h
> > 1 /dev/shm/tip/usr/include/linux/socket.h
> > 1 /dev/shm/tip/usr/include/linux/coda_psdev.h
> > 1 /dev/shm/tip/usr/include/asm/prctl.h
> >
> > They are all of the "extern's make no sense in userspace" type. What was
> > the verdict, are they worth touching, or should we turn off this warning
> > in 'make headers_check'?
>
> the warning wouldnt have been added if it didnt make sense ... like it
> says, prototypes for kernel functions make no sense in userspace headers
the existence of a warning does not justify it. For example the CONFIG_*
warnings were deemed largely bogus and were removed.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/