[PATCH resend] bsg: Fix sense buffer bug in SG_IO

[Boaz Harrosh]

When submitting requests via SG_IO, which does a sync io, a
bsg_command is not allocated. So an in-Kernel sense_buffer was not
set. However when calling blk_execute_rq() with no sense buffer
one is provided from the stack. Now bsg at blk_complete_sgv4_hdr_rq()
would check if rq->sense_len and a sense was requested by sg_io_v4
the rq->sense was copy_user() back, but by now it is already mangled
stack memory.

I have fixed that by forcing a sense_buffer when calling bsg_map_hdr().
The bsg_command->sense is provided in the write/read path like before,
and on-the-stack buffer is provided when doing SG_IO.

I have also fixed a dprintk message to print rq->errors in hex because
of the scsi bit-field use of this member. For other block devices it
does not matter anyway.

Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 block/bsg.c |   17 ++++++++++-------
 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/bsg.c b/block/bsg.c
index d414bb5..0ce8806 100644
--- a/block/bsg.c
+++ b/block/bsg.c
@@ -244,7 +244,8 @@ bsg_validate_sgv4_hdr(struct request_queue *q, struct sg_io_v4 *hdr, int *rw)
  * map sg_io_v4 to a request.
  */
 static struct request *
-bsg_map_hdr(struct bsg_device *bd, struct sg_io_v4 *hdr, fmode_t has_write_perm)
+bsg_map_hdr(struct bsg_device *bd, struct sg_io_v4 *hdr, fmode_t has_write_perm,
+	    u8 *sense)
 {
 	struct request_queue *q = bd->queue;
 	struct request *rq, *next_rq = NULL;
@@ -306,6 +307,10 @@ bsg_map_hdr(struct bsg_device *bd, struct sg_io_v4 *hdr, fmode_t has_write_perm)
 		if (ret)
 			goto out;
 	}
+
+	rq->sense = sense;
+	rq->sense_len = 0;
+
 	return rq;
 out:
 	if (rq->cmd != rq->__cmd)
@@ -348,9 +353,6 @@ static void bsg_rq_end_io(struct request *rq, int uptodate)
 static void bsg_add_command(struct bsg_device *bd, struct request_queue *q,
 			    struct bsg_command *bc, struct request *rq)
 {
-	rq->sense = bc->sense;
-	rq->sense_len = 0;
-
 	/*
 	 * add bc command to busy queue and submit rq for io
 	 */
@@ -419,7 +421,7 @@ static int blk_complete_sgv4_hdr_rq(struct request *rq, struct sg_io_v4 *hdr,
 {
 	int ret = 0;
 
-	dprintk("rq %p bio %p %u\n", rq, bio, rq->errors);
+	dprintk("rq %p bio %p 0x%x\n", rq, bio, rq->errors);
 	/*
 	 * fill in all the output members
 	 */
@@ -635,7 +637,7 @@ static int __bsg_write(struct bsg_device *bd, const char __user *buf,
 		/*
 		 * get a request, fill in the blanks, and add to request queue
 		 */
-		rq = bsg_map_hdr(bd, &bc->hdr, has_write_perm);
+		rq = bsg_map_hdr(bd, &bc->hdr, has_write_perm, bc->sense);
 		if (IS_ERR(rq)) {
 			ret = PTR_ERR(rq);
 			rq = NULL;
@@ -922,11 +924,12 @@ static long bsg_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
 		struct request *rq;
 		struct bio *bio, *bidi_bio = NULL;
 		struct sg_io_v4 hdr;
+		u8 sense[SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE];
 
 		if (copy_from_user(&hdr, uarg, sizeof(hdr)))
 			return -EFAULT;
 
-		rq = bsg_map_hdr(bd, &hdr, file->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE);
+		rq = bsg_map_hdr(bd, &hdr, file->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE, sense);
 		if (IS_ERR(rq))
 			return PTR_ERR(rq);
 
-- 
1.6.0.1


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/