Re: [tip:x86/asm] x86: document 64-bit and 32-bit function callconvention ABI
From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Tue Feb 03 2009 - 13:48:40 EST
* Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > - also clean up the calling.h file a tiny bit
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/include/asm/calling.h | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > 1 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/calling.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/calling.h
> > index 2bc162e..2d36d42 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/calling.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/calling.h
> > @@ -1,5 +1,55 @@
> > /*
> > - * Some macros to handle stack frames in assembly.
> > +
> > + x86 function call convention, 64-bit:
> > + -------------------------------------
> > + arguments | callee-saved | extra caller-saved | return
> > + [callee-clobbered] | | [callee-clobbered] |
> > + ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > + rdi rsi rdx rcx r8-9 | rbx rbp [*] r12-15 | r10-11 | rax, rdx [**]
> > +
> > + ( rsp is obviously invariant across normal function calls. (gcc can 'merge'
> > + functions when it sees tail-call optimization possibilities) rflags is
> > + clobbered. Leftover arguments are passed over the stack frame.)
> > +
> > + [*] In the frame-pointers case ebp is fixed to the stack frame.
>
> ebp or rbp ?
rbp - fixed it, thanks.
> > +
> > + [**] for struct return values wider than 64 bits the return convention is a
> > + bit more complex: up to 128 bits width we return small structures
> > + straight in rax, rdx. For structures larger than that (3 words or
>
> What size does "word" mean here?
> and is it rdx:rax (high:low)? Can it be so written?
> or at least say which of rax, rdx is high (most significant) and
> which is low (least significant).
no, word is the normal meaning: natural machine word. 32-bit on 32-bit x86,
64-bit on 64-bit x86.
>
> > + larger) the caller puts a pointer to an on-stack return struct
> > + [allocated in the caller's stack frame] into the first argument - i.e.
> > + into rdi. All other arguments shift up by one in this case.
> > + Fortunately this case is rare in the kernel.
> > +
> > +For 32-bit we have the following conventions - kernel is build with
>
> built
fixed that too.
> > +-mregparm=3 and -freg-struct-return:
> > +
> > + x86 function calling convention, 32-bit:
> > + ----------------------------------------
> > + arguments | callee-saved | extra caller-saved | return
> > + [callee-clobbered] | | [callee-clobbered] |
> > + -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > + eax edx ecx | ebx edi esi ebp [*] | <none> | eax, edx [**]
> > +
> > + ( here too esp is obviously invariant across normal function calls. eflags
> > + is clobbered. Leftover arguments are passed over the stack frame. )
> > +
> > + [*] In the frame-pointers case ebp is fixed to the stack frame.
> > +
> > + [**] We build with -freg-struct-return, which on 32-bit means similar
> > + semantics as on 64-bit: edx can be used for a second return value
> > + (i.e. covering integer and structure sizes up to 64 bits) - after that
> > + it gets more complex and more expensive: 3-word or larger struct returns
> > + get done in the caller's frame and the pointer to the return struct goes
> > + into regparm0, i.e. eax - the other arguments shift up and the
> > + function's register parameters degenerate to regparm=2 in essence.
> > +
>
> Same high:low comments here.
>
> > +*/
> > +
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * 64-bit system call stack frame layout defines and helpers,
> > + * for assembly code:
> > */
> >
> > #define R15 0
> > @@ -9,7 +59,7 @@
> > #define RBP 32
> > #define RBX 40
> >
> > -/* arguments: interrupts/non tracing syscalls only save upto here*/
> > +/* arguments: interrupts/non tracing syscalls only save upto here: */
>
> up to
pre-existing typo but worth fixing indeed.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/