[PATCH 2/2] posix-cpu-timers: use ->sighand instead of ->signal tocheck the task is alive

From: Oleg Nesterov
Date: Tue Feb 03 2009 - 18:20:49 EST


No functional changes.

It doesn't matter which pointer to check under tasklist to ensure the task
was not released, ->signal or ->sighand. But we are going to make ->signal
refcountable, change the code to use ->sighand.

Sadly, it is not trivial to audit kernel/posix-cpu-timers.c, but it really
abuses tasklist_lock. I believe it doesn't need this lock at all, but the
changes are not easy to test.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>

--- 6.29-rc3/kernel/posix-cpu-timers.c~2_CPU_TIMERS 2009-01-29 01:13:55.000000000 +0100
+++ 6.29-rc3/kernel/posix-cpu-timers.c 2009-02-04 00:09:23.000000000 +0100
@@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ int posix_cpu_clock_get(const clockid_t
}
} else {
read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
- if (thread_group_leader(p) && p->signal) {
+ if (thread_group_leader(p) && p->sighand) {
error =
cpu_clock_sample_group(which_clock,
p, &rtn);
@@ -374,7 +374,7 @@ int posix_cpu_timer_del(struct k_itimer

if (likely(p != NULL)) {
read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
- if (unlikely(p->signal == NULL)) {
+ if (unlikely(p->sighand == NULL)) {
/*
* We raced with the reaping of the task.
* The deletion should have cleared us off the list.
@@ -640,10 +640,10 @@ int posix_cpu_timer_set(struct k_itimer
read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
/*
* We need the tasklist_lock to protect against reaping that
- * clears p->signal. If p has just been reaped, we can no
+ * clears p->sighand. If p has just been reaped, we can no
* longer get any information about it at all.
*/
- if (unlikely(p->signal == NULL)) {
+ if (unlikely(p->sighand == NULL)) {
read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
put_task_struct(p);
timer->it.cpu.task = NULL;
@@ -812,7 +812,7 @@ void posix_cpu_timer_get(struct k_itimer
clear_dead = p->exit_state;
} else {
read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
- if (unlikely(p->signal == NULL)) {
+ if (unlikely(p->sighand == NULL)) {
/*
* The process has been reaped.
* We can't even collect a sample any more.
@@ -1146,7 +1146,7 @@ void posix_cpu_timer_schedule(struct k_i
read_lock(&tasklist_lock); /* arm_timer needs it. */
} else {
read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
- if (unlikely(p->signal == NULL)) {
+ if (unlikely(p->sighand == NULL)) {
/*
* The process has been reaped.
* We can't even collect a sample any more.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/