Re: cgroup mount point

[Harald Braumann]

On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 15:40:39 -0800
Paul Menage <menage@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Harald Braumann <harry@xxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >
> > So, what's the problem with /dev/cgroups then? If shm/ and pts/
> > are allowed under /dev, wouldn't it be discriminating against
> > cgroups/, to not allow it there?
> 
> Right, that's what I proposed a couple of emails earlier in this
> thread.

Sorry, I didn't mean to imply that you'd be against it, on the contrary,
I took your explanation as another argument for using /dev and
against /sys (/cgroups should not even be considered, IMHO). 

The question was targeted at those, who oppose it.

Cheers,
harry

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature