Re: [PATCH v2] ftrace: On PowerPC we don't need frame pointers forCALLER_ADDRs

[Benjamin Herrenschmidt]

On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 21:59 +0300, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 11:32:18AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > 
> > On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 19:19 +0300, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 05:06:45PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > > [1] Btw, why exactly do we need the -fno-omit-frame-pointer for
> > > "FUNCTION_TRCER" tracer? Why just -pg isn't sufficient?..
> > > 
> > 
> > The problem is this that is in the toplevel Makefile:
> > 
> > 
> > ifdef CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER
> > KBUILD_CFLAGS	+= -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fno-optimize-sibling-calls
> > else
> > KBUILD_CFLAGS	+= -fomit-frame-pointer
> > endif
> > 

And don't forget the gcc bug that miscompiles function epilogues on ppc
with -fno-omit-frame-pointer (iirc), which we need to work around using
-mno-sched-epilog.

Currently, we set that only if CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER is set, ie, we
assume that we only set -fno-omit-frame-pointer when
CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER is set.

Ben.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/