Re: [PATCH 2/3] work_on_cpu: Use our own workqueue.

From: Rusty Russell
Date: Tue Feb 03 2009 - 21:44:48 EST


On Tuesday 03 February 2009 14:36:49 Andrew Morton wrote:
> But as you say, rdmsr_on_cpu() is easy to do, using
> smp_call_function_single(). Then we can easily convert all other
> work_on_cpu() callers to smp_call_function_single() and zap
> work_on_cpu(). The best outcome, methinks.

grepping for set_cpus_allowed reveals the following users in the
first third (when I got tired of it):

File Function Context Calls
powerpc/kernel/smp.c smp_cpus_done kernel_init smp_ops->setup_cpu()
x86/.../speedstep-ich.c _speedstep_get cpufreq speedstep_get_processor_frequency()
x86/.../powernow-k8.c check_supported_cpu cpufreq cpuid_*()
x86/.../powernow-k8.c powernowk8_target cpufreq mutex_lock, etc
x86/.../powernow-k8.c powernowk8_cpu_init boot/hotplg rdmsr,wrmsr
x86/.../powernow-k8.c powernowk8_get cpufreq rdmsr
x86/.../speedstep-centrino.c get_cur_freq cpufreq rdmsr
x86/.../speedstep-centrino.c centrino_target cpufreq rdmsr,wrmsr
x86/kernel/reboot.c nativ..._shutdown sys_reboot misc
x86/.../microcode_core.c do_microcode_update sys_write microcode_ops->request_microcode_user
x86/.../microcode_core.c reload_store sys_write mutex_lock, etc

Some of these (reboot) we don't care what they do to cpumask. Some are
poor style, but not critical (boot time). Some can use smp_call_function.

But there are some which should *not* be frobbing their cpus_allowed, and
really do seem to want a user context.

I think you're right though: smp_call_function_single (or neat wrappers)
where possible, work_on_cpu which can fail for the others, and we'll just
have to plumb in the error returns.

I'll start the patchstream for 2.6.30.

Thanks,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/