Re: [PATCH 1/7] PCI PM: Fix handling of devices without drivers
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Date: Tue Feb 03 2009 - 21:49:43 EST
On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 18:23 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Whaa? This is basically totally obfuscated code both in the caller _and_
> in the callee.
>
> Now, it looks like this all then goes away in PATCH 7/7, so I guess I
> shouldn't complain too much, but I just don't see much point in carrying
> this broken patch around in the series, since it's then going away and
> rewritten almost immediately again.
>
> Apart from that complaints, Acked-by: for the series.
Same comments. It took me a while to figure the logic out, which I end
up agreeing with but the code is pretty obfuscated ... And yes, patch 7
seems to improve things, but then, that makes reading the patch itself
nearly impossible :-) I ended up patching the file and -then- reading
it.
I tried the whole thing on various powerbooks, along with some patches
I'm about to send for radeonfb, atyfb and aty128fb to make them properly
call pci_save_state() before they hand-change the D state, and things
appear to be working fine. (well, appart from some unrelated problems
leading to some might_sleep() hits but as I said, they are unrelated to
this series)
I need a couple more tests of the fbdev patches on some machine variants
and once done, I'll post them out. Hopefully tonight.
Cheers,
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/