Re: [PATCH 2/3] work_on_cpu: Use our own workqueue.

[Rusty Russell]

On Wednesday 04 February 2009 13:31:11 Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Feb 2009 13:14:31 +1030 Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I think you're right though: smp_call_function_single (or neat wrappers)
> > where possible, work_on_cpu which can fail for the others, and we'll just
> > have to plumb in the error returns.
> 
> I bet a lot of those can use plain old schedule_work_on().

Which is where work_on_cpu started: a little wrapper around schedule_work_on.

We're going in circles, no?
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/